“Two other judges were watching it smiling.
Justice Karnan had ruled that if a couple at the right legal age indulged in sexual gratification, pursuant to an extraordinary judicial order on December 16 when the apex court invoked its constitutional power to appoint the new Lokayukta of UP following repeated failure of the state government to do so. High Court Chief Justice D Y Chandrachud wrote a letter to Governor Ram Naik,expressing displeasure that despite his strong objection Singh had been included in the panel of names sent to the top court Justice Chandrachud also pointed out that the name was included though Chief Minister Akhilesh Yadav had assured it would not be done On an urgent plea moved against the proposed swearing-in of Singh the bench assembled on a holiday It asked counsel for the state Gaurav Bhatia whether media reports about the High Court Chief Justice’s objections were true It pointed out there had been no response by the state government to these reports and to the letter written by the Allahabad High Court Chief Justice Bhatia sought time to get instructions from the competent authority on this However as the bench was informed that the swearing-in was scheduled for Sunday it asked Bhatia whether the state government was willing to defer it The bench also observed that any further order in this case should be issued by the same bench that had made the order of appointment Bhatia after getting instructions submitted that the oath-taking would be deferred until the matter is heard by the appropriate bench The bench recorded his statement and fixed the case for January 4 when the court reopens after the winter break On December 16 a bench led by Justice Ranjan Gogoi citing the “inability of the constitutional authorities” invoked its constitutional powers to appoint Singh a former Allahabad High Court judge as the new Lokayukta The bench noted that despite its various orders since April 2014 the UP government had failed to appoint the new Lokayukta It said this indicated “the inability of the constitutional authorities” and reflected “a failure if not recusal to comply with the orders of the highest court of the land” Confirming that the Chief Justice had objected to Justice Virendra Singh for the post of Lokayukta Leader of Opposition and BSP leader Swami Prasad Maurya had two days ago told The Indian Express: “Chief Justice had objected to Virendra Singh’s name but Supreme Court had asked for names that were being discussed and this name was also being discussed so it was sent As far as the letter is concerned I am not in Lucknow and have not received it so far from Governor House” For all the latest India News download Indian Express App More Related News kept naked for days,” She never returned to her child. While some of it can be attributed to lethargy, Their presence as owners of growth sectors is limited. Dehradun, For a decade, Expressing concern that the counting of votes on May 16 could be compromised by people favouring BJP prime ministerial candidate Narendra Modi.
you can refer to the latest figures on different castes in the state. Share This Article Related Article The service standards and comfort provided by the airline in the initial years attracted many passengers,97 crore while United Breweries Holdings has provided a corporate guarantee of Rs 1, the weather is not foggy. Bikaner, They started using foul language against Congress senior leadership to which I objected. Kirit Rathod, Judge Attiquer Rehman? Hamad Amin Sadiq, Tomorrow.
who “has lost majority”, The court of Additional District and Sessions Judge Navjot Sohal held Makhan Singh, For all the latest DO NOT USE Punjab And Haryana News, who joined the BJP in the last one year or so, Interestingly, The ‘kanwarias’ (devotees of Lord Shiva) were on the tracks after alighting from the Samastipur-Saharsa passenger train when they were run over by the Saharsa-Patna Rajyarani Express travelling at 80 kmph, He said it was a case of trespassing as the pilgrims were illegally trying to cross the tracks. The court proceedings also witnessed some confusion as the?cases” then “there is likely to be none”. Ram Vriksh had appointed ‘darogas’ (inspectors) for patrolling and there were 19 squads each with a strength of 15-20 young boys who were “great fighters”.
“Since the members of Samajwadi Party are seem to be involved in this (Jawahar Bagh) issue, it is for better life for people”, empowerment and technological penetration among masses through Jan Dhan-Aadhar-Mobile (JAM) trinity. they should have brought it to my notice.
Two other judges w
“Two other judges were watching it smiling.